Confessions of an Automationeer, Part 229: Evolving the Automation Build Generator (and Creating Another)

Confessions of an Automationeer, Part 229: Evolving the Automation Build Generator (and Creating Another)

Recently, I updated the instructions for the Convertible, Fleet/Passenger, Concept, and Custom/Tuned spaces on the Type wheel (the first one on the top row of the Automation Build Generator spinner wheel set) to read "Respin x1" (in parentheses), to reflect the fact that a single respin of that wheel is required if it lands on any of those spaces. However, apart from this, I have not yet added, removed, or even renamed any spaces on any of the wheels in the Automation Build Generator. 

On the other hand, I've been toying with creating a simpler version of this set (or adapting the current one instead), with fewer segments on some of the wheels, but this would entail merging multiple different spaces into a single option on a particular wheel - an operation that would have to be performed multiple times. Specifically, the Type, Market, and Color wheels could be reorganized as follows:

• Type: Kei/Bubble/Micro, (Sub)Compact Hatch/City Car, Family/Premium Sedan, Luxury Sedan, Wagon/Estate, SUV/Crossover/4x4, (HD)Pickup Truck/Ute, MPV/Van (Cargo/Passenger), Coupe, Convertible, Muscle/Pony, GT Car/Luxury Coupe, Sports Car, Supercar/Hypercar, Concept, Custom/Race (16 total)
• Market: North America, Central/South America, UK, Italy, Germany, France, Europe (other), Africa/Middle East, China, Japan, Asia (other), Australia/New Zealand
• Color: Red/Maroon, Orange/Brown, Yellow/Gold, Green/Lime, Blue/Cyan, Purple/Violet, Pink/Magenta, White, Silver/Gray, Black

The resulting condensed version would be more like the original CEL Challenge set, but without provision for positive or negative modifiers, while retaining the possibility of selecting from various color options, albeit with a condensed set of choices.

As for expansion of the current Automation Build Generator spinner wheel set, splitting some of the existing options on the Type wheel into two new ones is possible; if I were to do so, it could be as follows:

• Compact Sedan/Hatch: Replaced with Compact Sedan and Compact Hatch. Both are identical except for body style.
• Midsize/Premium Sedan: Replaced with Midsize Sedan and Premium Sedan, the latter of which is more upmarket than the former.
• Sports/Super Sedan: Replaced with Sports Sedan and Super Sedan, the latter of which is more upmarket and places more emphasis on performance than the former.
• Fullsize/Executive Sedan: Replaced with Fullsize Sedan and Executive Sedan, the latter of which is more upmarket than the former.
• Premium/Performance Wagon: Replaced with Premium Wagon and Performance Wagon, the latter of which emphasizes performance more heavily than the former.
• Premium/Performance SUV: Replaced with Premium SUV and Performance SUV, the latter of which emphasizes performance more heavily than the former.
• MPV/Passenger Van: Replaced with MPV/Minivan and Passenger Van, the latter of which is generally larger than the former.
• Sports Car: Unchanged, but has a new option (Premium Sports Car) added immediately ahead of it. This option, slotted directly behind the Supercar space, is more upmarket by comparison.

Another optional expansion would involve adding and/or renaming options on the Market wheel, as follows: 

• Central America/Caribbean: A new option, placed directly after Canada but directly behind the South America space.
• Spain: Could be added between France and Scandinavia.
• South Asia: Could become a separate space, placed immediately before Southeast Asia, which in turn sits just behind another new space, titled Asia (Other).

The last candidate for expansion would be the Respin x1 wheel, which would have four spaces for each of its three options instead of one or two, as was the case previously.

It should be noted that implementing any (or all) of these expansions will not invalidate any previous combinations made using this particular set; however, considering the further increases in complexity they entail, the resulting set would have to be referred to as "Advanced Rules". The simpler version of that set, with fewer options, would be called a Basic Rule Set. As of now, the Advanced Automation Build Generator, with all three expansions implemented, would look like this:

Above: The Advanced Automation Build Generator after further expansion, with some spaces on the Type and Market wheels being renamed while new ones were added to both. In addition, the number of spaces on the Respin x1 wheel has been doubled.

And here are some of the combinations (including respin results, where applicable) that it generated after several experiments:

Above, from top: Some examples of combinations (complete with their corresponding respin results) generated at random using the Advanced Automation Build Generator.

I have since renamed the Lime Green and Sky Blue options on the Color wheel to "Lime/Bright Green" and "Sky/Bright Blue", respectively, as well as doubling the amount of spaces per choice on the Option wheel, but I haven't made any other changes to the set; the further updated version is shown below. However, while I will continue to use the original Advanced Rules set for when a more specific description is required or preferred, I will also use a simplified version (the "Basic Rules" variant) in its place whenever the greater precision afforded by the original set is neither necessary or desirable.

The simpler Basic Rules version of the Automation Build Generator (above) is closer in spirit to the original CEL Challenge spinner wheel set (or my Remix set based on it), but the more complex Advanced Rules variant (below) allows for a more precise result to be generated with each iteration.

In short, creating a simpler Basic Rules spin-off of my heavily revised and expanded Automation Build Generator (which I've since called the Advanced Rules set) should help restore its appeal to less experienced users, without compromising the greater depth desired by more highly skilled users who prefer the Advanced Rules variant. However, the Year wheels in both sets are exactly identical - and retaining it for both sets ensures that the trim year selection under Basic Rules is not too vague.

Confessions of an Automationeer, Part 228: Applying the Al-Rilma Automation Build Generator

Confessions of an Automationeer, Part 228: Applying the Al-Rilma Automation Build Generator

With the necessary revisions to my Automation Build Generator now finalized, I decided to give it a series of test runs, to determine its viability. After generating a multitude of example combinations, I was finally confident enough to run it for real, and it came up with this:

Above: The initial combination generated by the latest random experiment on the Automation Build Generator spinner wheel set after its most recent revision.

The Respin x1 wheel landed on Choice, so I had the option of spinning the Year wheel, since the Option wheel landed on Year. I chose to do so, and this was the new result from that wheel:

Above: This is what the Year spinner landed on after I decided to give it a respin - and I chose to accept the new result.

After a brief period of deliberation, I decided to accept the new result in place of the original one, which meant that I would build a dark green German grand touring car (or luxury coupe) with a trim year of 1994, instead of 2002 as originally planned. With these criteria now confirmed, I started by choosing a body set to use as the basis of my build. The '87 Boat, '88 Indicator, '89 Ice Cream, '90 Kompetitor, and '92 Evade all stood out as being the most compelling options, being available in the right size and wheelbase range for such a prestigious vehicle. As for the engine powering it, I settled on a 6-liter 48-valve quad-cam V12 with an aluminum/silicon closed-deck block and performance-optimized aluminum heads, capable of developing at least 400 horsepower in base trim while still retaining WES 9 compatibility - after all, I was planning to make this trim a range-topper, with lesser trims to follow.

In terms of aesthetics, I chose the '88 Indicator with a 2.85m wheelbase for being in the sweet spot - of the other four options initially under consideration, most of them turned out to be too large and heavy, and the '87 Boat and '92 Evade didn't even have a wheelbase within 0.03m of that figure. Moreover, capacity for four full-sized seats (as opposed to two full-sized seats up front and two smaller +2 seats in the rear) was non-negotiable. Air suspension was considered early on, but ultimately not fitted - I realized that its statistical improvements would not be worth the cost, reliability, and weight penalties it would incur. Finally, although I chose a 6-speed manual gearbox for my build, I designed it with provision for an automatic transmission option (specifically, a 5-speed electronic controlled unit) in mind, if comfort and drivability were to be even more important relative to sportiness.

Built on an AHS (advanced high-strength) steel unitary chassis with treated steel bodywork and fully independent suspension (dual wishbones up front and a multi-link rear end, augmented by adaptive dampers), this big, bulky behemoth of a car was not only strong, but surprisingly agile. By fitting large-diameter vented disc brakes (with 4-piston calipers up front and 2-piston items at the rear), the build was also capable of stopping just as well as it could go and turn. This braking system, incorporating anti-lock assistance, was housed behind 17-inch alloy wheels wrapped in staggered high-performance tires (245mm front/275mm rear). To keep wheelspin to a minimum, a helical limited-slip differential and traction control were both part of the standard equipment list. No undertray was fitted, however, since I felt it would be overkill on something that had to balance comfort with sportiness.

With a full luxury interior (available in a wide range of color and material combinations) and stereo sound system incorporating a CD player/cassette tape deck, plus the most advanced safety technology available at the time, all four occupants could enjoy a long trip in unexpected comfort, with assurance that they will reach their destination safe and sound. Variable-ratio hydraulic power steering was also fitted as standard - a necessity considering the car's weight. Although I had to choose a dark green exterior color for my build (as the combination stipulated), I also offered it a multitude of other paint colors in addition to this, to give the customer enough choices to satisfy their tastes.

I deliberately kept the car's price at or under $50,000 AMU, after realizing that this would be a reasonable price ceiling for anything aimed at the upper end of the Grand Touring demographic in-game, with the possibility of also competing in the even more exclusive Grand Touring Premium market. Both of these require an interior with four seats - hence my decision to fit exactly that many (full-sized) seats into my build, instead of just a pair. And while the 2-door sedan variant of the '88 Indicator had provision for such a seating arrangement, the same was also true of the 2-door coupe variant - which, crucially, was among the desired body styles for both Grand Touring demographics. It's worth noting that if the Type wheel had initially landed on the Convertible space (which would've led to a mandatory single respin of that wheel), and then landed on the GT Car/Luxury Coupe space, I would've had to choose the 2-door convertible variant instead.

Here is the car in its current form:

Above: The build resulting from the combination generated by the Automation Build Generator spinner wheel set.

In short, I enjoyed developing the build from this particular randomly generated combination, and could even add a fully detailed interior to it, if desired.